Ramanand Chaudhary &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 21 September, 2010

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.11072 of 2009
               1. RAMANAND      CHAUDHARY         SON       OF    LATE   PANCHU
                   CHAUDHARY
               2. BRIJ KISHORE CHAUDHARY @ BRAJ KISHORE CHAUDHARY,
                   SON OF RAMANAND CHAUDHARY
               3. PANKAJ CHAUDHARY @ PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY SON
                   OF SHRI ADYA PRASAD CHAUDHARY
               4. BHOLA PRASAD CHAUDHARY @ BHOLA CHAUDHARY SON OF
                   SHRI RAMANAND CHAUDHARY
               5. SUNIL CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI ADYA PRASAD
                   CHAUDHARY
               6. SITA RAM CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE RAMESHWR
                   CHAUDHARY
               7. SANTOSH CHAUDHARY S/O SITA RAM CHOUDHARY
               8. ADYA PRASAD CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE PANCHU
                   CHAUDHARY
               9. MUKESH CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI SITA RAM CHAUDHARY
               10. BANGALI    CHAUDHAR,      SON         OF   LATE    KAMLESHAR
                   CHAUDHARY
               11. SUSHI CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI ADYA PRASAD
                   CHAUDHARY
               12. AMRENDRA CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE KAMLESHAR
                   CHAUDHARY
               13. BHUSHAN CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI BANGALI CHAUDHARY,
                   ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATEHA, P.O. FATEHA, POLICE
                   STATION BACHHWARA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI
                                                             ..... PETITIONERS.
                                               Versus
               1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
               2. HARE RAM CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI RAM UDGAR
                   CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATEHA, P.O. FATEHA,
                   POLICE STATION BACHHWARA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI
                                                            .... OPP. PARTIES.
                                             -----------

2. 21.09.2010 The petitioners have sought quashing of the

order of cognizance on disputed questions of fact, which this

court is unable to appreciate at the stage of 482 Cr.P.C.

The application is dismissed.

Narendra/Ashwini ( Anjana Prakash, J. )