IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.21702 of 2010
1. RAMANAND SHUKLA SON OF LATE HARIDEO SHUKLA
2. SONU KUMAR SHUKLA
3. VIKAS SHUKLA
BOTH SONS OF AJAY SHUKLA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted
for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the
Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that it is highly
unlikely that father and sons together would commit
robbery.
Considering the same, let the petitioners,
above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya, in connection
with Sasaram Rail P.S. case no. 27/2010, subject to
the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a
close relative of the petitioners, who will give an
affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with
the petitioners and the other bailor
-2-
shall be local since petitioner belongs to Patna. The
bailors will undertake to furnish information to the
court about any change in the address of the
petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state
that the petitioners are not an accused in any other
case and, if they are, they shall not be released on
bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit
that they will inform the court concerned if the
petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar
nature after his release in the present case and
thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate
the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground
of misuses, (iv) That the petitioners will give an
undertaking that they will receive the police papers
on the given date and be present on date fixed for
charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates
and delays and trial in any manner, their bail will be
liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )