High Court Karnataka High Court

Ramanna vs Janakamma on 7 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Ramanna vs Janakamma on 7 December, 2009
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala


»«- -w “uwwmm ‘vmvw wwuwmawmuwmuwm t!’M”éa?r¥’%'”2 wwwau 3::-V9” flifififlfwfiiafifl

3: ma mm: cmm G? KAR1*¥A’Z’AKA AT , _

mama mxsmm 3% my me :3EcEMr.=§£R}j’29(é*;9j

BEFOEE

11$ E-i€;}H’BLE QR ,._1Us*ncE? Y %

WRYI’ Psmzcari zm.3gsé§kg.k%2a§9;<m§¢;r§3

Srigfiamazrm. S/as

R/*3 Rflrfigg; EZe'.K—?§ 1'fij.{'*r9:55é
K11ata*as*aeii§%agfaéa.
K.R'._2§£9haEa; 4:'. .. V

(By mvmgmiafiav. fer Srwa' m Law Firm)

A T,K&I"1r2appa,

551$
' _;;§;.::ga*,1§?.«;;:a%3 2:§ Effiamsg.
BE? S'c::'";:.~et;1'aiami fitiahak.
'§4_§}?'3;Gfé'3. :2'

' ' A sn;r£..fitmga mieshmi wig Eaju,

V. A ' 5..:;$ ywm, Qm: E11,
" ~..Rje §.§<:s.253£ Eadamfi Eamiappa
Euifi° K
Medm f:?JC;fi368~§ IE'
Efifiam -~ QG,

'4 Sfi. bim Sfc T.K.rismm,pm§

45 3&3? fix: Ki},
Egg B¢§Ia,1.32§.§ §

_g_

E E Sfimt, Maxfiilséehak
Eégmm – 12$

45 yesara, Gm; Hil,

R,/G D.Ha.1321, Nflraw,

B at Sum, mmximahazta,
Ifigrscm- 12.

5: Smt.Sarmat:i V?! a

39 yaam, Occ: Eil, ,

R19 D*Ha.’?4, Catmrii. bar.

5.

_§Ré

45

R} $ Bafmaar V

Lmfiifi 39%?

‘Z I£Sri:g i}:1’a1:a ‘S1 ‘$:
Egg; £*E§25.13′,I€i’eiw- CH saga
. 3* §31’=’%?’:%%’r§
_ ;EIaw5*’L§i4a”r2i§€zma§ Uta fifiad,
% _ “E{.G._Ka”grpé1,M3mre – 25.

am. far K: 2:9 5;

H ,iZe3wr3§m:::$

. ” ” = Fkmian ‘mt flied zmdar firfiaias 22$ am
2?_’}”‘»a;;f Qazmfinzfiéen of India prayizg we qzmsh ardaer
fiaizeé ‘3.5.:3,§9 gagaaafi in $,S.§a.2I7f§;%’? gL,a,Hc,14}
lmmd 1%? ficifiifiazmi Gévii dzzdga {Sr..Bn.}, at
pméuwd at A & éismims iiw
«apglicafianagrsdgtc.

..wmmw~m Haw” wwwml was rummwmamxmm WEWW MWWKE U?’ mfiwmwmm WKLWW um

:2z§§?¢;¢ 1 ta 5 km am 3 mi:

13% Writ Petitiscisn acmim an far Qrders _

the Caurt nmde the f::1®5u1g:~»

Since rwmndsmt R’a.? “3. V

pefitksnarg xmtim m

2* The 9.3.:-re.

2131997 ax}     Judga (822
um    fer qzmshing

the erae% <imé{:$,iT:%¢;3§K_g§€m¢¢ o;:'1I.fi.f'?a.l4 arm in
the ahaw aAȎ;i.r'i;.Vs:,3if.V

fitsrtznwi £31" the pefitiamr aubmits
. t {m

. ma. Ewe aiihmg Ear mrfitinn mzfi

V I» s Qwaasiafl af flaw suit seiwfiuie gsmwty. 'fm

' K1321 ism 51$ writtm stanemmt
%}~§13e.&5.1§97§ {$31355 wcm rramd an :.9;3s,:w7,

E was gs: As: tim may 3f fizmfi

wiciatme at' aaffirxciazzfg fix gskzintfis fiké §fiM§$,§.=§»

L/V

mm (}rdm' um Rule 9 as am awkkg %

fih mam' ' der m the writiam stabmwzt

aeremmk I.A.,H<:s.14 was am <:::1:i;)5;1t';'A2 €fi:*fJ39%v ' A

adjm1:rmed ta 15.16.2339 fir ubjanzfinfiw

rm rezpwxtation for the
rm: am 133 I.A.Hcn1é§ the
applicatien, azbvm I.A..R§.§4 mfiafiiéar
and mama g %3;:;":*¥'3m': zsfimwag. it £3
mmemxed daéiay in arm the
in mm rim

mm.

. ba&§ Eng. fifiumei. £92″ fix

31.1?/::m£ timt the: 3:331 Cami: was

the appiiwilzaszi {§.A.5§fi.§:§} mfi

fey 9? infirmity

in ardw,

8. It Em i ta mgsiimn tkmt t:lm@h the

p6§.’£iD:21fi Ems mt fihé abiwtien ta E.E;fie.M, tim trial

IV

M “W”-W” V’0WV’&”\<<l mwwmmxwwxmnwwnmww "mam WVJWKQ wr mmnawmémmm WWW @..£..3W«'é'§ %fiKf%§éW'.¢3Wfi% 3r"§§$%'*§ fifii.

M afiagafse $f'i;§:.;E€§§. :4 afimh in

,5.'

Court ha mt appiia ita miné mm withaui
masam has afinwaa I.A.,Ha.z4. Tim £3 m
er mind by rm taralal mm as

deiay £1: filing the rajcizxder as :;he

gr ths dgfmaam H¢.L "w%;t1§¢L:i=
apart tizw maxim flf ézda {sf
justim was impu§1ed the mm
is rmzm m f¢3%:'fz:5%§1£.:'.fii::2s@sa1 af the

agpiicatéon

5* getiiziam is aiiswsd.

Ffi

:fS.13'2n-Q9 at

"" "éaurt in diaefi m afiaré an

5%

gatéfifizm ta: fib @'5:§w?5mn mfi
gig xm

Sd/~
JUDGE