High Court Kerala High Court

Ramar vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ramar vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 3732 of 2007()


1. RAMAR, M.G.R.NAGAR, KARUMARI AMMAN COIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SUDHEER

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :17/01/2008

 O R D E R
                             V. RAMKUMAR , J.
               ==========================
                   CRL.M.C. No.3732 of 2007
               ==========================
                Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008.

                                 ORDER

In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner who

was the 1st applicant in C.M.P. No. 5504/2007 on the file of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate-II, Nedumangadu, challenges the order dated

24.08.2007 passed by the said Magistrate declining the release of an

eight year old female child by name Devi Ammal.

2. According to the petitioner, himself and the 2nd applicant in

C.M.P. No. 5504/2007 before the court below are the parents of the

said minor child and the child as well as one Maniamma, a relative of

the petitioner, were taken into custody by the Nedimangadu police

from the premises of the K.S.R.T.C bus stand, Nedumangadu where

they were waiting for the bus. Annexure B is the family card issued by

the Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Development, Tamilnadu.

Annexure C is the true English translation of Annexure B family card.

Annexure D is the identity card of the petitioner issued by the Election

Commission of India. Annexure E is the photograph of the minor child

Devi Ammal in the company of the petitioner, his wife Ammini and

their other children. According to the petitioner, the Magistrate did not

conduct a proper enquiry before passing Annexure 1 order.

: 2 :

3. Going by the report of the court below, the following facts

emerge:-

The eight year old minor female child by name Devi Ammal was

found along with one Maniamma in the premises of the K.S.R.T.C bus

stand, Nedumangadu and the Nedumangadu police took them into

custody and registered crime No. 255/2007 for an offence punishable

under Section 24(1) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of

Children) Act, 2000. The case was subsequently registered as S.T.No.

1186/2007 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Nedumangadu.

The accused (Maniamma) in the case pleaded guilty and hence was

sentenced to simple imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of

Rs.1000/- for the conviction and in default of payment she was

directed to undergo simple imprisonment for 30 days as per judgment

dated 10.05.2007. The child found in the custody of the accused was

however sent to the Missionaries of Charity Home, Kunnukuzhy,

Thiruvananthapuram on 29.03.2007 as it was felt that the child was in

need of care and protection. It was thereafter that on 18.07.2007 the

petitioner herein and another lady filed C.M.P.No. 5504/2007 before

the court below seeking release of the minor child. Even though the

learned Magistrate has declined the request for release of the minor

: 3 :

child, in the light of the decision of this Court reported in 2002(1) KLT

525 –Parvathy vs. The Superintendent, Corporation Relief

Centre, the SHO, Nedumangadu has been directed to conduct an

investigation into the whereabouts of the petitioners and the bona

fides of their claim and to file a detailed report regarding the same. As

and when the Magistrate receives a report from the S.H.O,

Nedumangadu, he will be passing appropriate orders according to law

taking into account the materials produced by the S.H.O and also the

materials if any produced by the petitioner and the second applicant in

C.M.P. No. 5504/2007. It is needless to mention that the learned

Magistrate shall pass final orders expeditiously and at any rate within

one month of receipt of a copy of this order so that in case the order

to be passed is adverse to the petitioner, they can resort to other

appropriate remedies.

This Crl. M.C is disposed of as above.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

rv

: 4 :