High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ramdayal Rai @ Jhagaru Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 19 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ramdayal Rai @ Jhagaru Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 19 October, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23047 of 2011
                      Ramdayal Rai @ Jhagaru Rai, S/o Janak Rai.
                                         Versus
                                  The State of Bihar
                                    ------------------

04. 19.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Section 386/34 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner’s name has

transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused

and there is no direct material against him, let the

petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the

Court to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Danapur

P.S. Case No. 69 of 2011 subject to the following

conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and

the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is

any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the
2

court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of

misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking

that he will receive the police papers on the given date and

be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so

on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date

and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

he has been implicated repeatedly at the instance of the

local police who is hostile to the petitioner and seeks

protection of a person well reputed doing social service in

the area. Under the circumstances, the petitioner will

report to Mr. Kishore Kunal, Chairman, Bihar Religious

Trust Board, Bihar, Patna, within fifteen days of his

release on provisional bail for a period of six months and

file a certificate about the same in the court within the

stipulated time. In case, the petitioner fails to file

certificate, notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of

bail, (b) That once the petitioner reports to Mr. Kunal, Mr.

Kunal is requested to evolve a method by which without
3

affecting the petitioner’s present vocation, if any, the

petitioner can be mode socially productive so that an

effort is made to bring him back in the main stream of the

society/ he is given adequate protection and (c) At the end

of the six months, the petitioner will be required to file a

certificate in the court below granted by Mr. Kishore

Kunal. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found

satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional

bail granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice for

cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-