High Court Kerala High Court

Ramesh.A vs State Of Kerala on 26 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Ramesh.A vs State Of Kerala on 26 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 9819 of 2009(V)


1. RAMESH.A, PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTITUTION

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

4. HEADMISTRESS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :26/03/2009

 O R D E R
                          P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
                 -----------------------------
                    W.P(C) No.9819 of 2009 -V
                ------------------------------
              Dated this the 26th day of March, 2009.

                           J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri.M.Balagovindan, the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioner and Sri.A.J.Varghese, the learned Government Pleader

appearing for respondents.

2. The petitioner is presently working as Physical Education

Teacher. He was advised for appointment by the Kerala Public

Service Commission, on 22.10.1999 and appointed by Ext.P2

Government order dated 7.1.2002. According to the petitioner he

possesses the qualifications prescribed for the post of HSA (English)

also. Claiming promotion as HSA (English), he moved the Deputy

Director of Education in Ext.P5 representation. The said request

was rejected by Ext.P6 letter dated 22.1.2009. In this writ petition

the petitioner challenges Ext.P6 and seeks a writ in the nature of

mandamus commanding the Director of Public Instruction to

appoint him as HSA (English).

3. The petitioner’s request for appointment as HSA

(English) was rejected by the Deputy Director of Education. The

petitioner has straight away moved this Court challenging Ext.P6

W.P(C) No.9819 of 2009 -V 2

without moving the higher authorities namely the Director of Public

Instruction and the Government. In my opinion the petitioner ought

to have moved the Director of Public Instruction or the Government

seeking their intervention. I am therefore not inclined to entertain

this writ petition at this stage. I accordingly dispose of this writ

petition with the following directions.

The petitioner shall within one month from today file

appropriate representation before the Secretary to Government,

General Education Department setting out his claims and

contentions. The Secretary to Government, General Education

Department shall within three months thereafter consider the said

representation and take a decision thereon in the light of the

relevant rules and the Government orders governing the field. The

Government shall also afford the petitioner a reasonable

opportunity of being heard before taking a decision in the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.N.RAVINDRAN
JUDGE
//True Copy//

PA to Judge
ab

W.P(C) No.9819 of 2009 -V 3