High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ramesh Kumar Verma vs State Of Punjab And Others on 11 September, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ramesh Kumar Verma vs State Of Punjab And Others on 11 September, 2009
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

                              CHANDIGARH

                                         Civil Writ Petition No.14210 of 2009
                                                Date of Decision: 11.09.2009

Ramesh Kumar Verma
                                                                    Petitioner
                                    Versus

State of Punjab and others

                                                                 Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH

Present:     Mr.Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner
                        .....

Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral)

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr.A.K.Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, Punjab Punjab accepts notice.

Heard.

By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that

directions be issued to the respondents, to release admitted payment, due to

him towards execution of works, detail of which has been given in

paragraph No. 3 of this writ petition.

It is case of the petitioner that he has successfully executed the

work, as mentioned above. Entries were made in the measurement book,

however, the payment has not been released. Thereafter, the petitioner has

served a legal notice dated 28.9.2008 (P5) for releasing the payment, which

is still pending undecided.

This Court feels that if there is no defect in the work executed

by the petitioner, the authorities are not justified to detain amount due to

him.

Civil Writ Petition No.14210 of 2009 2

In view of facts mentioned above, this writ petition is disposed

of by issuing directions to respondent No.3 to decide legal notice dated

28.9.2008 (P5) served by the petitioner and if there is no legal hitch, release

admitted payment to the petitioner, within three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner shall be entitled

to get interest @ 8% per annum from the date the amount had become due

to him till its realisation. To the contrary, if the officer concerned wishes to

reject claim of the petitioner, on valid grounds, a speaking order be passed

and a copy thereof be supplied to the petitioner.

Copy of the order be supplied to the State counsel under

signatures of the Court Reader for compliance.

11.09.2009                                   (Jasbir Singh)
gk                                               Judge