High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ramesh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ramesh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 October, 2011
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     Cr.Misc. No.33969 of 2011
                               Ramesh Kumar Yadav S/o Ram Karan Yadav
                                                  Versus
                                          The State Of Bihar
                                                -----------

2. 15.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 364and 366/34 of the Indian Penal

Code.

Considering that the alleged victim does not allege

anything against the petitioner, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Darbhanga in connection

with Keoti P.S. Case No.100 of 2011, subject to the conditions

(i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the Court about any change in address

of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that

the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is

he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below
-2-

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v)

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )