IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr. Misc. No.19572 of 2010
1. RAMESH PRAJAPATI
2. Sanjay Prajapati
Both sons of Munna Prajapati.Both resident of village-
Lamura, Police Station-Kochas(Parsathuan), District-Rohtas
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR .
-----------
2 14.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioners herein are accused in
connection with Kochas(Parsathuan) P.S. Case
No. 131/09 (S.Tr. No. 177 of 2010) for offences
punishable under Sections 302/201/34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
The petitioners have been charged of
being a party to the death of the sister of the
informant, Asarfa Devi who was married to co-
accused Anil Prajapati.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that these two petitioners Ramesh
Prajapati and Sanjay Prajapati are sons of
Munna Prajapati, the elder brother of the
husband of the deceased. He submits that the
deceased was earlier married to Awadesh
Prajapati and after his death she got married
to the younger brother, Anil Prajapati. The
cause of death has been attributed to certain
2
property disputes.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
relying upon an order passed by this Court in
Cr.Misc. No. 10314 of 2010 and Cr. Misc.
No. 16645 of 2010 dated 7.5.2010 submits that
most of the accused persons have been granted
bail by a Bench of this Court and these
petitioners who are based in Katani in the
State of Madhya Pradesh are sons of the own
brother. He submits that there is no direct or
indirect allegation against these petitioners
nor there is any materials connecting them to
the alleged occurrence.
Having regard to the submissions
aforesaid, let the petitioners namely, Ramesh
Prajapati and Sanjay Prajapati be released on
bail upon each of them furnishing individual
bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of
the like amount to the satisfaction of learned
4th Additional District Judge, Rohtas at
Sasaram in connection with Kochas (Parasathuan)
P.S. Case No.131 of 2009 subject to the
following conditions:-(i) That one of the
bailors will be a close relative of the
petitioners who will give an affidavit giving
genealogy as to how he is related with the
3
petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to
inform the court if there is any change in the
address of the petitioners. (ii) That the
petitioners will be well represented on each
date and if they fail to do so on two
consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to
be cancelled.
Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)