Ramesh Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ramesh Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Cr. Misc. No.6599 of 2011
                    RAMESH RAM son of Shri Ganesh Ram
                                   Versus
                          THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                 -----------

2/ 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

18.09.2010 for recovery of a country made pistol and a cartridge and

there is only one other case pending against him which fact shall be

verified by the court below before releasing the petitioner on bail, let

the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to

the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur,

in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No.223 of 2010, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Banti

Kumar, brother-in-law of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake

to furnish information to the court about any change in the address

of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that

they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)
2

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial

in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                           (Anjana Prakash,J.)
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *