High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ramkewal Singh &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 6 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ramkewal Singh &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 6 July, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CWJC No.10241 of 2010
              1.RAMKEWAL SINGH, SON OF LATE SHIV SINGH RESIDENT OF MOHALLA
                JALKADARBAGH, P.O. MADHAV MILL, P.S. MALSALAMI, DISTRICT PATNA.
             2. DEVENDRA RAM SON OF SUKHALU RAM, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA
                JALKADARBAGH, P.O. MADHAV MILL, P.S. MALSALAMI, DISTRICT PATNA.
             3. RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD SON OF RAJKUMAR MAHTORESIDENT OF
                MOHALLA KARMALICHAK, P.O. BEGAMPUR, P.S. BYE PASS THANA, DISTRICT
                PATNA.
                                     Versus
            1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THEOUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
               URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.
            2. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS MUNICIPAL
               COMMISSIONER, BUDH MARG, PATNA-1.
            3. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDHA
               MARG, PATNA-1.
                                                   -----------

02. 06.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and

the counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation(hereinafter

referred to as the Corporation).

2. Petitioners are the employees of the Corporation.

They have filed this writ application praying inter alia to direct the

Corporation to make payment of arrears of salary, arrears of

difference of salary in the revised scale, Assured Career

Progression, Dearness Allowance as such payment is not being

released by the Corporation on account of paucity of fund with the

Corporation and for release of fund the Corporation has requested

the State Government.

3. It is submitted by the counsel for the State that the

State has decided to release Rs.60 crore in favour of the local

bodies out of which the share of the Corporation may be to the

extent of Rs.39 crore, so submitted counsel for the Corporation.

4. Having heard counsel for the petitioners, state and

the Corporation and having appreciated the stay order passed by
-2-

the Division Bench of this Court under orders dated 12.5.2008

passed in L.P.A. No.960 of 2007, I dispose of this writ application

with direction to the Corporation to make payment of the arrears

of salary and other dues admissible to the petitioners no sooner

the Corporation receives fund for such purpose from the State

Government or generates its own revenue.

Rajesh/                                      (V.N.Sinha, J.)