Gujarat High Court High Court

Ramsinh vs State on 12 October, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Ramsinh vs State on 12 October, 2011
Author: Md Shah,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/14397/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 14397 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1304 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

RAMSINH
@ MAYLO DHAN BAHADUR THAPA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
M/S
S G ASSOCIATES for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
Mr.L.R.Pujari, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 12/10/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Rule.

Learned APP Mr.Pujari waives service of notice of rule for
respondent.

The
applicant is convicted by the learned 2nd Additional
Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Sessions Case No.48 of 2011 for the
offences punishable under Sections 376 read with Section 114 and
Section 506(2) of Indian Penal Code and ordered to undergo sentence
for three years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section
376 and pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo further simple
imprisonment for four months and also ordered to undergo sentence for
two years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 506(2)
and pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo further simple
imprisonment for two months. Both the sentences were ordered to run
concurrently.

The
applicant is held guilty for abetting the principal accused in the
committing the offence of rape. Considering the role attributed to
the present applicant and considering the sentence awarded by the
trial Court and considering the fact that the present applicant was
on bail throughout the trial, this application is allowed. Same
bail, fresh bonds.

Rule
is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(
M.D.Shah, J )

srilatha

   

Top