Gujarat High Court High Court

Ramsinhbhai vs State on 5 August, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Ramsinhbhai vs State on 5 August, 2011
Author: Anant S. Dave,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/11097/2011	 4/ 4	ORDER

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 11097 of
2011 
=========================================================


 

RAMSINHBHAI
CHHITUBHAI PADHIYAR & 1 - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
JM PANCHAL for
Applicant(s) : 1 - 2.MRKJPANCHAL for Applicant(s) : 1 - 2. 
MRS.
MANISHA L. SHAH, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

Date
: 05/08/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

RULE.

Learned APP Mrs. Manisha L. Shah waives service of notice of Rule
for the respondent – State.

This
application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as
I-C.R. No.20/2011 with Vedach Police Station, Bharuch for the
offences punishable under Sections 420, 120(B), 506(2) and 406 of
the Indian Penal Code.

Learned
Counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the
complaint is filed after a period of three months of the alleged
transactions and the co-accused is enlarged by this Court vide order
dated 01.08.2011 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application
No.10221/2011. It is submitted that considering all the above
circumstances, by imposing suitable conditions to secure
the presence of the applicants during trial, the applicants may
be enlarged on bail.

Heard
learned APP Mrs. Manisha L. Shah for the respondent-State.

Having
heard learned Counsels for the parties and perusing the record of
the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature
of allegations, role attributed to the applicants, by imposing
suitable conditions, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the
applicants on bail.

Learned
Counsels for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.

In
the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed
and the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection
with First Information Report registered as I-C.R. No.20/2011 with
Vedach Police Station, Bharuch, on executing a bond of Rs.5,000/-
(Rupees Five Thousand Only) each with one surety of the like amount
to the satisfaction of the Trial Court and subject to the conditions
that they shall;

a)
not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

b)
not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

c)
surrender their passports, if any, to the lower court within a week;

d)
not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the
Sessions Judge concerned;

e)
mark presence at the concerned Police Station on the first Sunday of
every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;

f)
furnish the present address of their residence to the Investigating
Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond
and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this
Court;

The
authorities will release the applicants only if not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions
Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to
try the case.

At
the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage,
made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

Rule
made absolute. Direct Service is permitted.

Sd/-

(Anant
S. Dave, J.)

Caroline

   

Top