High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Randhir Rana @ Randhir Kumar Rana & … vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Randhir Rana @ Randhir Kumar Rana & … vs The State Of Bihar on 12 September, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.27128 of 2011
                  1. Randhir Rana @ Randhir Kumar Rana son of Parmanand
                     Singh
                  2. Parmanand Singh son of Late Rakatu Singh
                  3. Shanti Devi wife of Parmanand Singh
                                                Versus
                                         The State Of Bihar
                                              -----------

2. 12.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

case registered under Sections 365 and 366 of the Indian

Penal Code.

It has been submitted that after the case of

kidnapping was filed by the father of the alleged victim girl

and the boy i.e. petitioner no.1 got married with consent of the

girl’s parents and, therefore, it could not be in the interest of

justice to put the petitioners behind the bar.

Considering the same, let the petitioners above

named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest

or surrender before the learned court below within a period of

12 weeks from today in connection with Karpi P.S. case

No.90 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject

to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of

the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will
-2-

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with

the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information

to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners.

(ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given

dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the

petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to

do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

The Magistrate concerned is directed to immediately

commit the case to the court of Sessions and the Trial Court

thereafter will pass appropriate orders as to whether any

offence is made out in the facts of the case.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )