IN THE HIGH COURT cm KARNATAKA, '
DATED THIS THE 11TH Daffbfi %.:x&::m,.
BEFORE A' V' . ' '
THE HONWSLE MR. Jl}'8'IV'I(2»l'§";"2AlK, "BEOHANV ' '
mu-r pmrrxors yo.759g__¢g3__ms 1sc:g-s1'1~ "
BETWEEN :
1 RANGAPPA" :'
AGES Afgioifi' égfkfizéxké, "
:2, RAM2§{:HA'ia;1$iaA:A%1E1'575if_A Q
AG£«:.§> _Ai$OU"£?;,5? YEARS,' . ,
3 'r:mMMA.:A'H'j"--.. "%., '-
AGED 'AB(JU'I"' 54 YEAW5,
4 V1:)1VsH1iii:L}'MA:?2 A
,, ._%_AGED Aaomf 52jn:ARs,
LA 5 . fS3I_f)i)Ai?3'E'.A
_ " AGED -.4gB0m' 47 YEARS,
ALL«'I7flE'~Ai4'PELLANTS ARE SONS
A ' '01:' _LA'E'}?j;i)OBi3AIAH AND ARE R/AT.
BYETANAKURKE, KORA (HOBLI)
'iEINi;KUR TALUK. PETITIONERS.
- '~ "(EA3y; Sri. SHIVNSWAMY 3%
1' s1=::.«'c M VENKATA REDBY, ADVS.)
% f_ ' 'V AND:
1 STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY SECRETARY TO GOVT
DEPRRTMENT OF REVENUE,
BY" ITS SEERET'AV1ATE. ii ;
24R
under a Sale Deed executed on 3~2-1965 by H
grantee who was granted the
No.DEP.DAR.128/54-55, free oi: cos; 'of¢$11:$ived< by 7
issue of a saguvali chit: Anne'x-u;ve--"B'-",_ '
have presented this 'ii: the
order dated the Assistant
Commissioner ano solider dated 10-
933003 in
2. fiommissioner and the Deputy
'~ 'Med 221 finding of fact that the lands
granted to a person belonging to the
s¢n;cau1¢d¢;.s¢c on 30-03 1956, free of cost, followed by
'"-.., '~iessue efa Saguvali chit Annexure-"B" laced with the
"=£:_m1§iijion of noz1--a1ienatio,t1 for a period of 10 years
K fjqereikom, on enquiry under The Kamataka Sehecimed
Castes and Scheduied Tribes (Prohibition of 'I'rarssf"er of
Certain Lands) Act, 1978, for short the Act, into,
filed by Respondent No.4 » the legal heir 3 _
3. The contention of the
petitioner that in the absex:1_eeV_% o£’A’Lh_e V age t ” ‘
certificate, the authorities not -gusfified in
declaring the transactiofloft’ and void and
directing restoration inmy considered
opinion,–~ eiineuxzftstances of this case,
must stand’ re}):eIifec1,% *r»”1*I3eV”Assistant Commissioner, the
fact findViVi1g as well as the Deputy
r ._ «–‘Ati;e.Appe1late Authority, having perused
feeaenue records, concluded that the 43*
‘if;-.5; Iegaj representative of the deceased
entitled to restoration and resumption of
more so when there was no dispute that
K grantee was a member of the Scheduied caste and
the saie transaction, apparently, was in breach of the
condition of non-alienation, attracting the proV”iSio¥1is’»l’-of”
the Act.
4. Having regard to the
the light. of established inhthe it
the first transaction daiied beiiig””wi1:i1iI1 the
period of 10 years it the date of
Saguvali ohita..v.v’e:S’jnot§;_oIii§{i.a Ilieiiiityvfiffitialso Void. The
tra11sIe17ee=-.-.:aii_efiee. uiidef ¥jt”1’e~~ii:1*st alienation did not
derive fight; _ t:r_:’i:i1i:t«;rest in the said land and
therefore not :3, better title than what he
= ageetion -<iV"Vo:iv'—-~t~.i'*1'e Act prohibits any person from
pxefseaszxig iand either before or after the
eoin,;iieneeir§§::it of the Act, in violation of or breach of
' tile terineand conditions of the gant.
The orders of the authorities are W€H~II16'E'itCd,
" fziiiy justified and do not Suffer from any legal iniinnities
ealiing for interference in exercise ofwrit. juI'isdi.ction.
EWE.,:_ {\
KS
Writ petition is accordingly, rejected.