IN 'THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 11m DAY 09 AUGUST 2010
PRESENT ' % % é
THE HON'BLE MR.J.S.KHEI~iAR, CHIEF' ' T ' Q
AN!)
THE Homam MRS.JUSTI()E CHELLHR " k
wmr APPEAL NOS. 335/201016}2g>'1e:ifiA:12:§S3 k
BETWEEN: «L %
1. Rangappa,
3/0 Kafiyappa, . . : - *
Aged ab9ut74 y<*;ar<.3;.VL»V.'* g
R/at Ward No._1--, - .
Bidanagere Extensien, » 4' -V =
13.1%. Road,v.I<;1;xiigai'F{}wrx,._" "
Tumkur lisistrict .,
2. BC. Venkatesh G0wd.af._
S/0 Chinna A
Aged about 33
E3./at Ward No. 1, " V _
* Bidanagé1*e.";*iT.xi:a_r1sion;' """ "
B. M. _R9_ad.,, Klmftigal Town,
Tumkur I'.)i$t3_7i(:Lf- . V V .2 '
Appellants
'(B§'~R,s. mg; Adv.,)
' V' V .Nagava1}i 'I'1:313:1{1§::"T"I)i$'t,1'ict.
fir
1. State of Karnataka
Rep. by its Principal Secretary
to Government.
Deparunent of Irrigation,
Vidhana Seudha,
Bangalorewfifie 00 1.
$9
The Under Secretaly,
{Land Acquisition 1,3)
Deparmlent of Revenue, « .
MS. Building,
Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, __ ;
BaI1ga1ore--56(}OO1. _ '
3. The Special _
Hemavathi Divisitgn,'--.V:T-«--..VL " _ '
4. The Executive * "
Cauvery Neeravari
Hemavathi Divisiog '
Hebbur, Dist;%ict;~._
5. ,Assi$£a;f3t~E_xec1.1tive EI;gw1-rxeer,
Cauvery Nceravazriv Nigma Niyamita,
No;6,"'Hemmsati1i Division,
Disti'i}:fi3.t;3;)i"1 gab 'Division,
. . . Respondents
V Adv. ,)
Appeals are filed 'under Sectien 4 of the Karnataka
V Act praying to 536$ aside the order passed in Writ
e,:f'e.fitio:i N(}.4364/2006 dated 27.11.2008.
These Writ Appeals coming on far preiitninmy hearing this
day, Chief Justice delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Through the instant writ appeals, the r.-,§.1 aye
assailed the order passed on 27.1 1.2098» aflowhigj
No.4364/ 2006.
2. A perusal of the
the writ petifion, the ;é;.aé1’aCeCiV’VjI*eIiaI1<:e on
the decision rendered M..4..P et;;:.ign No.983/2006
(Smt.Thimmamma vs; emers), decided on
27.11.2008.
3. Ileafned parties are ageed that the
order passed. by Writ Petition No.983/2006 was
aeeéeled A’13.peaI” &l$&§;’8v9/2009 and the same was dismissed
by a 13:vi~siǤn 9: this com: on 15.6.2009. The judgment
upexiby__v’i;%1§e..’.»’1eaI’z1e<i Single Judge has thus been affirmed.
" t.31eé:'iz1stant writ: appeals are iiable to be dismissed in
4
izerms of the order passed by this Court in Writ Appeal NQ,V駧§’;.20O9.
Ordered accordingly.
Dismissed.
On account of the fact that t11’e”‘L4L1Vt§’-.;:Li1″1 ‘iiaflre beéh
disposed of on merits, the {Sf delay does
not survive for consideration. H ‘
‘ _.Chie£ 3\,1.$’tiC@
Sd/-‘
JUDGE
._bkv L % & ._
mdcx: yet;-[110 j_