IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 640 of 2010(D)
1. RANI BABY, W/O. BABY JOSEPH,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SECRETARY, TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
... Respondent
2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
4. CANAN TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD.M,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.SADASIVAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :13/01/2010
O R D E R
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
-----------------------------------------------
WP(C) No. 640 of 2010
----------------------------------
Dated, this the 13th day of January, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Challenging Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders, the petitioner has
already approached the statutory authority by filing Exts.P3 and P4 appeals.
The grievance of the petitioner is that, it is without any regard to the pendency
of the above proceedings, that the coercive steps are being pursued against
the petitioner, which hence is sought to be intercepted by this Court.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. After considering the particular facts and circumstances narrated
in the Writ Petition and also after going through the contents of Exts.P7 and
P8, this Court finds it fit and proper to have the matter finalized by the
Appellate Authority at the earliest.
4. In the above facts and circumstances, the 3rd respondent is hereby
directed to consider Exts.P3 and P4 appeals in accordance with law, as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt
of a copy of this judgment. Till such final orders are passed, all further
proceedings pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 shall be kept in abeyance, subject to
the condition that the petitioner shall furnish a ‘security bond’ to the satisfaction
of the 2nd respondent.
P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE
dnc