Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
LPA/1999/2010 2/ 2 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 1999 of 2010
In
SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9358 of 2010
To
LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 2005 of 2010
In
SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9364 of 2010
With
CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 9617 of 2010
In
LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 1999 of 2010
To
CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 9623 of 2010
=================================================
RANJANBEN
JAYANTILAL VAIDYA - Appellant
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT & 5 - Respondents
=================================================
Appearance
:
MR KAUSHIK PUJARA, SR. ADVOCATE
WITH MR PUSHPADATTA VYAS for Appellants:
MR SHIVANG SHUKLA, LD.
AGP for Respondent : 1,
None for Respondents : 2 - 5.
MR
KASHYAP R JOSHI for Respondent :
6,
=================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
and
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
Date
: 20/08/2010
ORAL
ORDER
(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)
Heard
learned Senior Advocate Mr. Kaushik Pujara with Mr. Pushpadatta Vyas
for the appellants.
This
group of appeals are filed against an interim order passed by
learned Single Judge dated 10/8/2010, wherein learned Single Judge
has issued rule and not granted interim relief, but notice as to
interim relief is made returnable on 7/9/2010.
Taking
into consideration the nature of the controversy involved in the
matter, it would be open for the learned advocate for the petitioner
to request before the learned Single Judge that the entire matter be
heard on that day.
In
view of the observations made in Letters Patent Appeals, learned
advocate for the appellants does not press the appeals. Hence the
appeals are dismissed as having not been pressed.
No
order in civil applications in view of the order of dismissal of
appeals.
Registry
to maintain copy of this order in each of the appeals.
[
RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J ]
[
S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J
/vgn
Top