High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ranjit Singh Alias Sita vs State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ranjit Singh Alias Sita vs State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH




                          Criminal Revision No. 31 of 2009
                          Date of decision : July 31, 2009


Ranjit Singh alias Sita
                                             ....Petitioner
                          versus

State of Punjab
                                             ....Respondent


Coram:        Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal


Present :     Mr. PS Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner
              Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab



L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)

Accused Ranjit Singh alias Sita has filed this revision petition

impugning order dated 31.10.2008 passed by learned Judge, Special Court,

Sangrur, whereby application moved by the petitioner for release of new

Motorcycle marka Bajaj Paltina bearing Chassis No. MD-2000222 RPA

14674 Engine No. DYV BRP 14975 of red colour on sapurdari in FIR No.

103 dated 29.6.2008 under section 15 of NDPS Act (for short, the Act)

Police Station Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur, has been dismissed.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

case file.

According to the prosecution version, petitioner was

apprehended while carrying 8 kgs of poppy husk on the aforesaid

Motorcycle.

Criminal Revision No. 31 of 2009 -2-

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that this Court in

the case of Raghbir Singh alias Bera vs State of Punjab, 2006 (4) RCR

(Criminal) 343 has allowed release of vehicle on sapurdari in such cases.

Inspite thereof, the learned Special Judge declined sapurdari on the ground

that said order of this Court in the case of Raghbir Singh had been stayed

by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in petition for Special Leave to Appeal

(Criminal) 4044 of 2007. Learned State counsel states that the said petition

for special leave has since been dismissed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court

keeping the question open because in that case, car in question had already

been delivered to the owner pursuant to the orders of this Court and

therefore, there was no ground to interfere at that stage.

Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Mehma Singh

states that proceedings for confiscation of the Motorcycle have not yet been

initiated. The Motorcycle is lying in Police Station for more than a year

and a month. Obviously condition of the Motorcycle will deteriorate while

lying in the open in the Police Station. No useful purpose will be served by

keeping it in the police custody.

In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is allowed and the

impugned order dated 31.10.2008 of learned Judge, Special Court, Sangrur

is set aside and the above mentioned Motorcycle is ordered to be released

on sapurdari to the petitioner on furnishing sapurdginama to the satisfaction

of the trial court.



                                                        ( L.N. Mittal )
July 31, 2009                                                Judge
   'dalbir'