Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Raseena vs Anvar on 20 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RCRev..No. 109 of 2006()


1. RASEENA, W/O.MUHAMMED ASALAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ANVAR, S/O.MUHAMMED KASSIM,
                       ...       Respondent

2. BADARUDHEEN, S/O.LATE MEERASA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.)

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

 Dated :20/12/2010

 O R D E R
                         PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &
                       N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
              ------------------------------------------------
                       R. C. R. No.109 of 2006
              ------------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 20th day of December, 2010

                                 ORDER

Pius C. Kuriakose, J

It is submitted by Smt.Zohra on behalf of the learned counsel for

the petitioner that the subject matter of RCR.400/2005 and the

subject matter of the present RCR is one and the same. A copy of the

judgment in RCR 400/05 is incorporated. Having gone through the

judgment, it is found that the building in question is already delivered

back to the landlord. We are of the view that nothing survives for

consideration in this RCR. Smt.Zohra would now submit that a

connected Second Appeal as 136/03 is pending before this Court. In

view of that submission, we dispose of this RCR as infructuous

observing that this judgment will not cause any prejudice to the

contentions of any of the parties in Second Appeal No.136/03.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
JUDGE

N. K. BALAKRISHNAN
JUDGE
kns/-

-2-


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

66 queries in 0.101 seconds.