High Court Kerala High Court

Ratheesh vs State Of Kerala on 26 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Ratheesh vs State Of Kerala on 26 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3818 of 2007()


1. RATHEESH, CHUTTIPARACKAL VEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SADASIVAN PILLAI C.R., KOONAMANGAL HOUSE
3. ANISHKUMAR G., ARYAT HOUSE,
4. SAJI KUMAR, CHIRATTOLIL HOUSE,
5. BINU ALIAS KOCHUMON, VILLATH HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :26/06/2007

 O R D E R
                                   R.BASANT, J

                         ------------------------------------

                              B.A.No.3818 of 2007

                         -------------------------------------

                     Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007


                                       ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioners are accused 2, 8, 9,

12 and 13 and they face allegations, inter alia, under Sections 332

and 308 I.P.C. The alleged incident took place on 30.03.2007. On

receipt of information that there was a chance of a political clash in a

locality, the police party allegedly rushed to the scene. A police

official was attacked and deterred from performing his work. The

members of the group allegedly indulged in acts of violence.

Altogether there are 18 accused. The petitioners apprehend imminent

arrest.

2. In response to a specific query by this Court, it is

submitted that no serious injury is reported to be suffered by anyone

of the victims. I find merit in the submission of the learned counsel

for the petitioners that exaggerated allegations have been raised

against the petitioners on account of political animosity. I am, in

these circumstances, satisfied that directions under Section 438

Cr.P.C can be issued in favour of the petitioners.

3. In the result, the Bail Application is, allowed. The

following directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

B.A.No.3818 of 2007 2

i) The petitioners shall appear before the learned Magistrate

at 11 a.m on 03.07.2007. They shall be enlarged on regular bail on

their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand

only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate;

ii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and 4

p.m on 04.07.2007 and 05.07.2007 and thereafter between 10 a.m

and 12 noon on all Mondays and Fridays for a period of three months

and thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in

writing to do so;

iii) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest

the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law as if those

directions were not issued at all;

iv) If the petitioners were arrested prior to their surrender on

03.07.07 as directed in clause (1) above, they shall be released on bail

on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

thousand only) without any sureties undertaking to appear before the

learned Magistrate on 03.07.07.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-

B.A.No.3818 of 2007 3