High Court Kerala High Court

Rathinam Ammal vs Thiruvananthapuram District … on 15 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Rathinam Ammal vs Thiruvananthapuram District … on 15 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16373 of 2009(N)


1. RATHINAM AMMAL,D/O.SWARNNAMMAL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,

3. A.NADARAJAN,AMC 28/08 SANTHI NAGAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LIJU. M.P

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :15/06/2009

 O R D E R
                    P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       W.P. (C) No. 16373 of 2009
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  Dated, this the 15th day of June, 2009

                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the

proceedings taken by the respondent Bank invoking the relevant

provisions under the SARFAESI Act. The case of the petitioner is that,

he happened to be a defaulter, not because of any wilful or deliberate

negligence, but due to some unforeseen circumstances and that

earnest efforts are being made to wipe off the entire liability. The limited

prayer of the petitioner, as put forth by the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner is that, the petitioner may be permitted to clear the

entire liability by way of installments.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank

as well.

3. Considering the fact that the outstanding liability as on date, is

admittedly more than Rs.19,00,000/- and that the cause of action

pertains to the loan transaction of 1999, the petitioner is directed to pay

a sum of Rs.5 lakhs within one month. The balance amount shall be

cleared by way of 8 equal monthly installments commencing from the

10th of August, 2009. It is made clear that if the petitioner commits any

default in effecting the installments, as aforesaid, the respondent Bank

will be at liberty to proceed with further steps for realization of the entire

WP (C) No. 16373 of 2009
: 2 :

amount in lump sum.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE

kmd