High Court Kerala High Court

Rathinam vs State Of Kerala To Be Represented on 28 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
Rathinam vs State Of Kerala To Be Represented on 28 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP.No. 12544 of 2002(R)


1. RATHINAM W/O.LATE MOSES,AGED 35 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner
2. G.RAJKUMAR S/O.GURUSWAMY,MUNNAR COLONY,
3. J.PAUL; S/O.JAYARAJ,MUNNAR COLONY,
4. R.KARUNA NITHY S/O.RAMIAH,MUNNAR COLONY,
5. V.ANANTHASELVI W/O.RAMESH KUMAR,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA TO BE REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,IDUKKIM DISTRICT,

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE TAHSILDAR,DEVIKULAM TALUK,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.VARGHESE N.M.

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :28/07/2009

 O R D E R
                       C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                  ....................................................................
                        O.P. Nos.12544 & 6666 of 2002
                  ....................................................................
                     Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009.

                                         JUDGMENT

The two connected O.Ps. are filed by holders of small extent of land

for assignment by the Government. Land is in Munnar which is KDH

Village where Land Assignment Act is not applicable. However, according

to the petitioners, Section 9 of the Kannan Devan Hills (Resumption of

Lands) Act, 1971 provides for assignment of land to agriculturists,

agricultural labourers etc. The petitioners claim to be agricultural labourers

occupying 3 to 5 cents of land wherein they are residing. Government

Pleader submitted that the land occupied by the petitioners is required for

construction of quarters for Government officers. However, he has not

stated why the Government permitted encroachment of the land and setting

up of houses by these people. Even if petitioners are encroachers, it is seen

that Government has not taken any steps to remove any encroacher from

Government land. In fact it is the policy of the Government to assign land

to the landless atleast for construction of house. This court has noticed that

Government has taken steps to conduct enquiry about bogus pattas issued in

the Munnar area. On conclusion of those investigations, position will be

2

clear to the Government as to the area covered by bogus pattas and the land

available to the Government for assignment and other purposes. If

petitioners are landless people, then certainly they are entitled to

assignment, if not the land presently occupied by them. In the

circumstances, these O.Ps. are disposed of directing the District Collector to

conclude all the investigations in respect of bogus pattas and other enquiries

pending in the area and as soon as possible consider petitioners’ eligibility

for assignment of land presently occupied by them or any other land in the

area. In any case petitioners should not be removed without considering

their eligibility for assignment, if they are residing there. In other words,

under cover of this judgment none of the petitioners should be allowed to

encroach over any Government land, if they are not staying there.

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Judge
pms