High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ratnesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ratnesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 September, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10951 of 2008
               Ratnesh Kumar, son of Sri Ram Baitha, resident of
               village Sukhsenuamishra, P.S. Kateya, District-
               Gopalganj.                    ........... Petitioner
                               Versus
             1.The State Of Bihar through the Principal
               Secretary, Human Resources Development
               Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna
             2.The Director, Elementary Education, Human
               Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar,
               Patna
             3.The Collector, Gopalganj
             4.The District Superintendent of Education,
               Gopalganj
             5.The Block Development Officer, Kateya, District-
               Gopalganj
             6.The Gram Panchayat Raj Ameya, P.S. Kateya,
               District- Gopalganj, through the Mukhiya
             7.The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj
               Ameya, P.S. Kateya, Gopalganj.
             8.The Head Master, Govt.Primary School, Sahjanwan
               Kala P.S. Kateya, Gopalganj
             9.Manoj Kumar Paswan, son of Moti Lal Paswan,
               resident of village Bhimpur, P.s. Garhariya,
               District- Siwan, at present posted as Panchayat
               Teacher in Govt.Primary School, Bhagyapatti
               Jheel, P.S. Kateya, District- Gopalganj.
                                             ............ Respondents
                       ----------------------------------

2. 13/09/2011 Grievance of the petitioner is that

though he was appointed as Panchayat Teacher

through letter dated 7.12.2006 and joined as

such in the School, he has not been paid his

salary so far.

Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner is continuing in

the School till now. Petitioner has filed

representations before different authorities

but his grievances have not been redressed
2

as yet.

Petitioner has an alternative remedy

before the statutory Appellate Authority to

ventilate his grievances.

In the circumstances, this writ

application is disposed of with liberty to

the petitioner to file an appeal/complaint

before the concerned Appellate Authority

within four weeks from today. If he does so,

the Appellate Authority shall issue notice

to the concerned parties giving them

opportunity to be heard, shall call for the

original records from the School and the

Panchayat with regard to actual functioning

of the petitioner and with regard to the

dues of his salary and shall pass

appropriate orders in accordance with law

within two months from the date of filing of

appeal/complaint by the petitioner.

Pradeep/                            ( J. N. Singh,J.)