IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.37978 of 2008
Ratnesh Prasad Thakur, Son of late Raghunath Prasad Thakur, resident of village-
Budhnagra, P.S. Mushari, District- Muzaffarpur.
Versus
The State Of Bihar
For the petitioner: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhayay, A.P.P.
-----------
02 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
This application has been filed to discharge the
petitioner for the offence under Section 304 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
main act was done by 1000-1500 persons, while two persons
entered into the house of informant to commit crime, who was
caught by the mob. It is submitted that the petitioner had lodged
an F.I.R. against the deceased and others. The Court has referred
paragraphs- 54, 58 and 62 of the case diary and stated that the
petitioner cannot be discharged at this stage. Probably, as far as
the discharge application is concerned, the Court below is
correct in holding that may not be discharged at this stage,
however, the Court below is directed to look into all the
materials during the trial including the fact that the mob of 1000-
1500 persons is said to have been responsible for the occurrence.
This application is disposed off with the aforesaid
observation.
Md. Ibrarul ( Sheema Ali Khan,J.)