High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Raushan Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Raushan Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 August, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.27531 of 2010
                         CHANDAN SINGH SON OF LATE VIJAY SINGH
                                             Versus
                                      STATE OF BIHAR
                                               With
                                Cr.Misc. No.28009 of 2010
                     RAUSHAN SINGH SON OF DHIRENDRA PRASAD SINGH
                                             Versus
                                   THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                           -----------

2. 16.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 379, 411 and 120B of the Indian Penal

Code.

Considering that the motorcycle was recovered from

the joint possession of the accused persons and the petitioners

have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named,

who are in custody since 7.5.2010, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) eachwith two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) in Bhabua P.S.case No.172 of 2010,

subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be the

father/mother/sister of the petitioners and the other bailor will be a

close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor

will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change

in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly

state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and
-2-

if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor

shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature

after their release in the present case and thereafter the court

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) that the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail

will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) that the

petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to

do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Narendra/