High Court Kerala High Court

Raveendran vs Arun on 24 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
Raveendran vs Arun on 24 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA No. 492 of 2008()


1. RAVEENDRAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ARUN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. K.K.BABY,

3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.A.HASHIM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :24/03/2008

 O R D E R
                          J.B.Koshy & K. Hema, JJ.
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            M.A.C.A.No. 492 of 2008
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                 Dated this the 24th day of March, 2008

                                    JUDGMENT

Appellant sustained serious injuries in a motor accident. He claimed

a compensation of Rs.3,50,000/-. The Tribunal awarded only Rs.70,000/-.

It was found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the driver

of the vehicle, insured by the 3rd respondent insurance Company. Only

dispute is regarding the quantum of compensation.

2. As a result of the accident, lateral of right orbit and right

temporal bone were fractured. There was injuries namely epidural

haematoma over the right temporal region of the brain. He had prolonged

treatment. Considering the contentions on both sides, he was sent for

examination by the Medical Board. The Medical Board assessed the

disability at 0%. Therefore, there is no loss of earning power. Considering

the injuries suffered by him Rs.20,000/- was awarded for pain and

suffering. Expenses for Medical bills were reimbursed. For loss of actual

earning Rs.20,000/- was awarded, considering the long treatment period.

Towards loss of amenities Rs.10,000/- was awarded and total amount

awarded was Rs.70,000/-.

MACA 492/08 -2-

3. Considering the fact that there was no permanent disability, we

are of the opinion that the compensation awarded is just and reasonable and

no interference is necessary. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

J.B. Koshy, Judge

K. Hema, Judge

mn.