High Court Karnataka High Court

Ravenappa S/O Dyavappa vs State Of Karnataka on 29 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Ravenappa S/O Dyavappa vs State Of Karnataka on 29 July, 2008
Author: Subhash B.Adi
m THE men OOIIRT or KARNATAKA gr   -. x

mm» 'mxs mm 2913 DAY or JUL'?  V  %  

mmnn  

ms aoarnm MR. JUSTICE  5'.  . "  1 T

 

Criminal Revision pmfiagio. 831 oiflg _   
Between:  ' ' A' E

Ravenappa

S/o Dyavappa

Aged about 34 years V 1 Q  .  »
Shyathaiakoppa       
Soraba'i'aluk    =     .

Shimoga District    .  "    .. Petitioner

(By Sri B.An,aV 1: "c1;  
And: 1   % V  %

1.

State of V
By Sorafiia __

‘ V ., …… ..

€~1v+’I’e3a9Pa
Aged 13?

omrvi ‘T¢isP¥*==l ‘T

3/0 Ramappa

fifitd 75 years

S] o” Tejappa

V f f % “5.-. Fflfiaypfi
*3/o Tejappa

Aged 29 ycazs

. Gangadhara

S/o Te’ a

Aged 2 €’ga;rs
Mahadcvappa

S/o Ramappa

Aged 57 years

All are Agriculturists
R/o Shadalakoppa Village .

Soraba Tahlk ‘

(By Sri Honnappa, HCGP) ‘ ” ‘

This czimina1:.»1*cvis;ion =:pet;i1i€in”«is” filsdja/s 397 r/W 401
Cr.P.C. by the AdvQ<ivate;1'_ibr_ thepefiifiogzeif praying that this Hoxfble
Court may be plcz#xse<1"to'"qizasli=i:hc"39:1; the order of acquittal
dt. 16.1.2007 pass¢:d"~hjj_thc F'–rc:–1':~,– shjmiaga in S.C.No.118/2005

This comm' g up for orders on this
day, the Court the 'following;–

V:(}ov§z-131;;1'jctnt44Vt'P1ca:icr is directed to take notice for the

1cspo1:idci;§t;s.tA and also on merits.

_. Thtilttis at delay of 456 days in filing the mv1s' ion pe:t:rt1o' ' n.
petition is by the oompiaiuant against the judgment
The Samba Police charge-shcetcd the accused for

h punishable under Section 302, 12043, 201 read with 149

the deceased. They are all interested Witnesses. Fu1'E"hcr.'V:.'PW-1

who alleges that he had heard accused Nos.1 to 6 talking

finishing thc deceased i.c., the father of the PW-1 K

earlier to the incident neither he ._tht_: ~:déT<;::_é: a_as«3§1"'V'jr1oV:'*

inform the police, nor did he mfqm "

disbellcved" the avid' tznce of these VVi1IIi€_§S3S, Hy u T s1.'ht':I'fi

was previous cnemity betwtwn t}:1¢:.V'1ie:zi1_:ics~§§"L.The o'ti1£.*:rA"wi111csacs

have not supported the

4. The Triai .ou§;A_¢og3.-é3£ier2§fi§i:1 .. cvizdtznce found

that there to the alleged murder
of the father the accused. Though there is
iI1DIdiI1at€:d§1’3y,’, éi’£:_::lit mi c§§’;1u§id;-rafion of the entire cast, I do not
xfé””i11t£:1’f’t:rc with the judgment on merits.

may Lfccn satisfactorily cxpzaincd, hence 1.1%.] is

mvision is also tiisxnmst-:43′ .

Sd/–

Judge