High Court Karnataka High Court

Ravi @ Kadaba Ravi vs State Of Karnataka on 15 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Ravi @ Kadaba Ravi vs State Of Karnataka on 15 September, 2010
Author: N.Ananda


DI THE HIGH cmzm err KARKATAKA AT

msvsn THIS 7532 mm my cm ssmxsmxngesifil ”


BEFGRE

mn HQMLE     "  _ 

egg ‘ 1Petitiar3,N_9.35$-*r&3§§’:)f’20§.;tA.”A ‘~*

Eetwmn:

Raxri@ KadabaRavi ‘ “


Sim: iata Srinfl ' ' 
Agad23ymrs, Mamnn      '
Rmiéant cf _  

Mandya     

(By S:*§;.vS».S.§{%§¥§i;.:?x§1:$i::§§:a€é§?¢3–~ j %
Sta3::;é’§§fi£arn$;ta.1’$<n9@

h§.r__ the 3mm ?uh35.c

Baregalore .3 .. Rwponcieztxt

{By mgaymm Majage, awn

criminal patzitiacen E fileci "axis 439 Cr.P.C.. by

" _ ' for the petitioner pwaying that this Hoxtfbk
Cpurt; may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
' -~€3r.;H0.589I 200'?' sf Srirsxgapatraa P.S., Mandya District

am am,

This petition eomitg an far .,
Caurtmadathefeilnwixagz : "

mm is a summa¢e%jLjaa;1 'Vgtlm
pem't:sZ9ne?r when is in SC
33.143; mm pmdiug pmmmme

umlczr 155?, ééith Sectian 149

'Sm-.u'9r Counsel appaa,m1g'

far am1;V w;é.:1.i}t':_1" that Whfifi dismiss' m the

pe;'%.is§%i"""'i193f2fl; this Caurt had mt

disc:-cparzcim ftmnd in the firat

and' stafimts af e3re—w'2tz1' assw. 'This

also faiimt its mime that amufiad N99 has a

44 to care far.

3.T’.EJ.e1awis&§rIyve*e11satth::i. Inordsrw

mafrziafiz 3. suwasiw baii apglieatinn, the azxsusczd will

N ,.

haw ta aatabiish charge in tha citwmtanm. I:§§~.mt
End any shame in the actirmmtanees.
would refw tr: saw: of the aubmj:as£ar:asi….té§_f:i;d;e:.A./.?;t3-]?_ .,

Ieexfi Seninr Caumel.

43 Sri Kati}, laameei submit
that 7m the firs: n:1*er%mna§x;§:%% igmm mcvcpt
acsuaad No.1, their

fazgm 7f§s?ith. eir<:umtanc&, tine aye-
wmm' 3%». the czthar asaazhn" my

Ha~wf¢?e2*., ifivwtégafion statmenm af cya-

an rmrd in show that eye-

L’ assaiianm.

‘ SV. ‘I’he mm in per1.d.1ng’ .. At; this ataga, aezaaaz’

af tm mate: *3 likely is pvrejuclim both the

” mufian and the mzsefi. ‘}hex%:~e% mzficm it for me

a: state the: $31; informatimri 35 mt the be and the wad of
the case. The fiat informfizm 21% not xxxntain the

hit r

dataiis sf arxi 2% sf all that amazed,

k when it was mt Eodgad by an
the fi m. Tbemfom, I 6.0 mt find

grmzt hail. Amrdirgly, ;

Imam trial Judge ahafi £11.: %

mam sha.11m~epe:rate. ” 1
Iudgflfé