High Court Kerala High Court

Ravi Mynagapally vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 23 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ravi Mynagapally vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 23 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16934 of 2008(S)


1. RAVI MYNAGAPALLY, AGED 37,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT

3. THE CHAIRMAN (DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA POLICE

5. C.S.RAJAGOPAL, VILAYIL PUTHAN VEEDU,

6. THE SECRETARY, OACHIRA TEMPLE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.S.JOHN

                For Respondent  :SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :23/06/2008

 O R D E R

H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

W.P (C). No. 16934 of 2008

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2008

Judgment
H.L. Dattu, C. J:

Petitioner calls himself a public spirited citizen. He is before this Court,

questioning the award of contract for the construction of a Plant and Auxiliary

Building for the Titanium Sponge Project at Chavara to the 5th respondent.

2. In our view, this petition does not even have a tinge of public interest

litigation. If for any reason, any person who had participated in the tender process

and has quoted the lowest rate, and if for any reason his bid is not accepted, he

could definitely come before this Court and question the award of contract in

favour of respondent No.5. In our view, petitioner is not expected to espouse

the cause of other tenderers by filing this public interest litigation. In that view of

the matter, we decline to interfere in this writ petition.

Ordered accordingly.

H.L. DATTU
Chief Justice

A.K. BASHEER
Judge

an.