IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.38358 of 2010
RAVI SINGH @ RAVI SHANKAR SINGH
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3/- 13.01.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of
the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as
well as learned P.P. for State.
Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with
Nauhatta P.S. Case No.4 of 2010 registered under
Sections 341, 342, 379, 384,386 and 504/34 of the
I.P.C.
Petitioner is named in the First Information
Report along with others with allegation that he as well
as other accused demanded extortion money from the
informant.
The contention of learned counsel for the
petitioner is that the instant case has been brought by
the informant on account of land dispute and as a
matter of fact, the informant wanted to construct road
on the land of petitioner and others, which was
protested by the petitioner and other accused. Learned
2
counsel for the petitioner also submits that so far as the
criminal antecedents of the petitioner is concerned, all
the cases were instituted against the petitioner on
account of land dispute.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the
informant vehemently opposes the prayer and submits
that the petitioner and his associates demanded
extortion money from the informant.
Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances as well as submission of the parties,
above named petitioner is directed to be released on
bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram
in connection with above stated Nauhatta P.S. Case
No.4 of 2010.
( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Ashwini/-