High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ravindra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ravindra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.25896 of 2011

Ravindra Kumar, Son of Late Jawahar Lal Mahto, Resident of Village/Mohalla Lodipur, Budha
Marg, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town and District Patna.
                                                                           ---------- Petitioner
                                           Versus
The State Of Bihar.
                                                                       -------- Opposite Party
                                         -----------

02/- 26/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with

Complaint Case No. 1701(C) of 2009 for the offences punishable

under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in

this case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand

of dowry, torture etc.

Submission is that under compelling circumstances,

petitioner had to earlier file an application under Section 9 of the

Hindu Marriage Act, seeking restitution of conjugal rights, but

ultimately filed an another case under Section 13 bearing No. 766 of

2009, pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna,

wherein, on the prayer of the complainant under Section 24 of the Act

as per ordered Rs. 2,000/- per month is being paid and no amount is

lying due.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in

the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four

weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on

furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial
2

Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No.

1701(C) of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2)

of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain

physically present before the court below on each and every date at

least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in

case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any

reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the

liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.

Praveen/-                             ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)