IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31947 of 2011
Ravindra Sharma
Versus
The State Of Bihar
2. 15.10.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner
is permitted to make necessary correction in
the petition.
Heard learned counsels for the
petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his
arrest in a case registered under Sections
41 and 42 of the Forest Act.
The forest officer intercepted a
truck with wood lodgs. The driver and
cleaner of the truck disclosed the name of
petitioner that he had prepared forged
permit and on the basis of which the wood
logs were taken from the forest officer. It
appears that the license is in the name of
one Vijay Sharma and the petitioner is the
labour of Vijay Sharma. It appears from the
prosecution report that the alleged forged
permit was in the name of M/S. Sharma Saw
Mill, Aurangabad whose proprietor was Vijay
Sharma.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let
the petitioner, above named, be released on
2
bail in the event of arrest or surrender
before the learned court below within a
period of twelve weeks from today in
connection with Forest Act Case No. 01 of
2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned C.J.M. Aurangabad, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)