Ravishankar R vs Associated Cement Co.Ltd,Blore … on 16 July, 2008

THIS RFA IS FILELD U/8.96, OF (§F?C§ AGAIISf’f3*’F’..’I’¥~i:E
JUDGMENT’ AND necmza D’I’.2?.i3.9’8_PASS-ED .xN’A0.s,:NeV,.

1305/91 BY THE vm ADDL. ‘r;;”r¥ C1m;”ATJUD;f;E,
BANGALORE, DECRESEING T E SUIT ‘FvOR’w,_RECOE$.§RY_,’OF
MONEY. ‘

This RF’A,, comm” g on £014 ism; 1.,’-fl. «;hjs:_dfiiy,v»»SABHAHIT
J., delivered the following: =_ A V’

% % ;;::U%=:>.<;:+.a_:r…r:_:~I:.i;' % %
This mattez§'WaV;s..Vei1::gIv"'p2i:3s€:ai ever since the

learned for"t11e. was not present.
Caiied out again'. for the appellant was
not present and ui19.VrcpIVias_é1;1f,eiti:;:{i£ is made. Aceonclingly, the

apgwgal is fof'z1o;;–__prosecufion.

Sd/–

Judge

Sd[-1-

Judgg