Registrar General High Court Of … vs T D Durgaiah on 19 October, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 

PRESENT O V.'
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.G.SABH£X_}%§'fIA..:::  3

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B-,v9.'NAGARATHNA   V

MxsC.CRL.NO.413S"E{2I139/2a1'0AEN 
CRL.CCC.NO.22/2005ISUO-Moro} 

BETWEEN:

THE REGISTRAR.GENERFII;.::'w ' 
HIGH COURT QI4'«.KARNATAKA -
BANGALORE]    . p 

... COMPLAINANT

{By Sr:5'-CHANDRA'jM:OU'I;IA,C._:SSIfi,"AND SR1 KARUNAKAR.
HCGP) ' * 2   

"V"«..TDv-':ID:€UR(:3rAiAH  ..... 

POLICE 'INSPECTOR

 _\/"'I.JA'1'ANvAGAR_PQLICE STATION

I3Ar--;IGAI;O'RE 
A '   ...ACCUSED

 _  7.__{1-3y Sr'1~~: R' MANJUNATH, ADV.)

A  A"SUO MOTU CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT

 "::CA$.E'ij_« IS INITIATED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE
 CONSTITUTION OF' INDIA R/W SEC. 15(2) OF' THE

 OF COURTS ACT, 1971, FOR TAKING

"APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST ACCUSED UNDER THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971.



These 1VIisc.C1'ls. coming on for Hearing this___ day,
SABHAHIT J, made the following: ' "

ORDER

Learned State Pubhlc Prosec1:1t6r”s11t_)raits.that he’–:hax’s’;

no further evidence.

2. Heard on the application Cwiieihcevveharge is

altered and the accuaeidpt. guilty. The
applications are allowedippixqioif tiiephireasrjning shown in
the applications.’ 1 Shall before the court

on pireéent on the said date.

isd/i

Sd/’5
Iudgéf’

s*’