Remya Chandran vs District Educational Officer on 30 June, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14735 of 2009(J)


1. REMYA CHANDRAN,HSA (ENGLISH),
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SHUHIBE.K.,HSA (ARABIC),
3. SINDHU.P.,UPSA,
4. SIDHIQUE,UPSA,

                        Vs



1. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

3. MANAGER,MUSLIM GIRLS AND BOYS HIGH

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :30/06/2009

 O R D E R
                      T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      W.P.(C) No. 14735 of 2009-J
                   - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                Dated this the 30th day of June, 2009.

                                 JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed initially by four petitioners and presently,

only the third petitioner is interested in the matter and the other petitioners

have been deleted from the party array by separate orders. The third

petitioner was appointed as U.P.S.A. by Ext.P3 order. The approval stands

rejected by Ext.P8 order passed by the District Educational Officer, viz. the

first respondent. Various reasons have been stated in Ext.P8 for rejection of

the approval. Presently, an appeal is pending from Ext.P8 before the

Deputy Director of Education, as per Ext.P12.

2. The writ petition was filed mainly aggrieved by Ext.P16

notification issued by the management for filling up of various vacancies.

Since the statutory appeal filed by the third petitioner is pending, it will be

appropriate that the said appeal is disposed of within a time frame. In the

counter affidavit filed by the Manager, it is pointed out that no approval has

been granted to the fresh hand.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Govt. Pleader and

learned Senior Counsel appearing for the third respondent.

wpc 14735/09 2

4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to pass orders

on Ext.P12 appeal after hearing the third petitioner and the present

Manager, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

kav/