High Court Kerala High Court

Renjith @ Kakka Renjith vs State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Renjith @ Kakka Renjith vs State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6889 of 2009()


1. RENJITH @ KAKKA RENJITH, AGED 30 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :25/11/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                      B.A. No.6889 of 2009
                  ------------------------------------
            Dated this the 25th day of November, 2009

                              O R D E R

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime

No.320/2007 of Nallalam Police Station, Kozhikode.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 392 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case is that on 2/11/2007, while the

defacto complainant was returning home after closing jewellery

shop belonging to his uncle, three of the accused persons

attacked him and robbed 2 Kgs of gold and Rs.1, 70,000/-. It is

alleged that the petitioner is the kingpin of the offence and that

he is involved in five other cases, wherein the offences alleged

are of similar nature. The petitioner surrendered before court on

15/10/2009 and he was remanded to judicial custody. All the

accused persons are not arrested so far.

4. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that

from the date of incident, the petitioner was not available for

arrest. It is submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail, it

B.A. No.6889/2009
2

is likely that he may make himself scarce. It is also likely that

the petitioner may indulge in similar criminal activities.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, I am inclined to accept the contention put forward by the

learned Public Prosecutor. At this stage, I am not inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner, as his release would adversely affect

the proper investigation of the case. The likelihood of his

involvement in similar criminal activities also cannot be ruled

out.

For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm