IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER':2:'()'h:i:'{):.I
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE Vt
CRIMINAL PETITION N'O.2Ie;"23/'2'Q:oAI = "
BETWEEN: V V" x
1. Revanna
Aged about 54 yea'1'sT' _ ;
S/O Late Sannaiah V "
2. SH1t.ShiVa1ޤ1& _ 3;
Aged about
W/0 RévaI.i11a" '
3. Srj.ks£fita..iIv5._v _ 1
Aged about' i1'.'5..yea1*sI.__--- ' '
S/O'Revann.a_ " "
All are at '- :
,.Riath'a.n apur v-.V11_1age
* Hur1surI-- Taluk """ "
2 .,MysvOre--D 1str1ct. ...PETITIONERS
Adv.)
-- j " S'ta._t_e3Of Karnataka
2 By Hunsur Pohce
* "Rep. by State Public Prosecutor
" High Court Building
Bangalore -- 1. ...RESPONDENT
(By Sri Vijayakumar Majage, HCGP]
This Crl.P is filed under Section 438 g.._Cr.P.C
praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the ‘event of
their arrest in Cr.No.285/2010 of Hunsur Rural _”Poiice
Station, Mysore district, registered for _t;h’e«[,offen.;;v:e*sp
punishable under sections 498(A}, 307 r/*:2i(“34.f:.,Il–‘C’l
under sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohib_ition”fAct;.,: i V
This petition coming on ::,for,-ortdelrsg
Court made the following: ” ‘ ” ‘ ~ ‘~
,,._.,,._o R
The petitioners .Aig;;~{;1;;sed Nos.2 to 4
registered for:../go-fferi_ces under sections
49s(A), 30% IPc,rivv,:{nd’f,uVfidef sections 3 and 4 of
police.
2. “‘H_eardfVf’ Counsel for petitioners and
_ lea.rnedl”Governmentfleader for the State.
1 and 2 are the paIents–in–law and
petitionvei”.,l’§’o.3 is the brother–in–law of first informant.
first accused is the husband of first informant. As
‘per the first information, after marriage, the husband of
~-first informant had developed illicit intimacy with one
Rukmini. In the first information, it is alleged that
these petitioners had assaulted first informant and were
3\; . t \._.. .5» L =
frequently demanding her to bring dowry. ‘I’here__ is no
medical evidence in proof of the allegations rnades._i’nVg:first
information. The grievance of first informs-nit
be illicit intimacy of first accuse.;l”w”–;th c’ne_.l”‘{i1l{inirii}.l
4. Therefore, Withou.t’g.o_ing into’
direction sought for is granted’ for a.’iirn_itedfi%period to
enable petitioner to “.ba2li jurisdictional
Court.
5. In .the’=follVoWing order:
:Petitioi'{i._V iusilf.4;SilééfitifitecisVnpetitioners are granted
anticipatory’ bailgj following conditions:
.. If /accused Nos.2 to 4 are arrested in
No.285/2010 by Hunsur police for
punishable under Sections 498(A], 307
Section 34 of IPC and also for offences
punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry
Prohibition Act, they shall be released on bail
on their executing bonds for a sum of
Rs.25,000/~ each offering a surety for the
likesum, av Ci.W__<-'\.-«… .55:x',\,\,C';£.-an
2} Petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 4 shall not
intimidate or tamper with the
witnesses.
3) Petitioners/accused Nc}s’;’2*tn 4′,’,gfo:1f” Anufpdse 9
of investigation, shall;__
Investigating Offieeif; “”;vhenei.z¢_1* ‘ tot V
do so.
4) This order a period of
twof. such time,
to 4 shall seek
jtldefprelthevtfiurisdictional Court. In
“the learned Judge of the
LA VCourt shall consider bail
without being influenced by
* .,.:””o.bse>rVati0ns made in this order.
Sdf-3
fudge
‘ “”I’iaS.