High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rinku Singh vs State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Rinku Singh vs State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                      Cr.Misc. No.27651 of 2010
                 RINKU SINGH, Son of Sri Dwarika Singh, resident of
                 Villlage-Mohanpur Karja, Police Station Barhara in the
                 district of Bhojpur.
                                                  Versus
                                          STATE OF BIHAR .
                                                -----------

3 12.10.2010 Having heard Mr. Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned

senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, counsel for

the State as also counsel for the Informant, while this Court

considering seriousness of the allegation for offence u/s 364 I.P.C.

as brought forward by the informant of the petitioner being last in

the company of the deceased and its being also corroborated in the

three statements under section 164 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

for the present. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is

rejected for the present.

The petitioner is in custody since 5.6.2010. Counsel

for the Informant would submit that the Informant will produce all

the named private witnesses in the chargesheet within a period of

six months from the date of framing of charge. The Superintendent

of Police, Bhojpur is also directed to ensure production of the

official witnesses including the Investigating Officer within the

same period of six months.

Since the petitioner is in custody and is the sole

accused, there should not be also any difficulty in either

committing the case or framing the charge. The trial court,

therefore, should take all expeditious steps to conclude trial of the
2

petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period

of nine months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this

order.

If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the

aforementioned period, the petitioner will have liberty initially to

move the trial court which then would record its reason for not

concluding the trial, whereafter the petitioner may renew his

prayer for bail before this Court.

Abhay Kumar                                         ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)