Rintu Titus @ Julie Remya vs T.P.Sen Kumar Ips on 24 May, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con.Case(C).No. 75 of 2010(S)


1. RINTU TITUS @ JULIE REMYA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. T.P.SEN KUMAR IPS,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :24/05/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
                        ...........................................
                      Cont. Case.No. 75 OF 2010
                       ............................................
           DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2010

                                  JUDGMENT

According to the standing counsel for the first respondent, the

award has been satisfied and the entire amount due to the petitioner has

been paid. The counsel for the petitioner disputes this submission.

According to the counsel for the petitioner, amounts are still due and

payable to the petitioner as per the award of the MACT. It is submitted

that MACT is yet to pass orders on this question. In the above

circumstances, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to approach this

court again, if it is found that the award of the MACT has not been

fully satisfied, this contempt case is closed. Needless to observe that

the tribunal may decide whether its award has been fully satisfied or

not, within a period of two months.

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE

lgk