High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rohitashaw Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar on 14 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rohitashaw Kumar Singh vs State Of Bihar on 14 March, 2011
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Cr. Misc. No.42899 of 2010
            ROHITASHAW KUMAR SINGH son of Late Sitaram Singh
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF BIHAR
                                 -----------

3/ 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody

since 17.08.2010 and the entire case is based on documentary

evidence as also that now charge sheet has been submitted in the

matter.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul

P.S. Case No.49 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) That one of

the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about

any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall

also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his

release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking
2

that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given

dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                           (Anjana Prakash,J.)