Loading...

Roni vs State on 29 March, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Roni vs State on 29 March, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/4311/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 4311 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 898 of 2009
 

 
=====================================
 

RONI
KIRAN RODRIGUES, THRO'DENIS KIRAN RODRIGUES - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

===================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR H.S.MULIA for Applicant(s) :
1,PARTY-IN-PERSON for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR KP Raval, APP for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=====================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P. P. BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/03/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

1.0 Present
application is filed by the brother (Denis Kiran Rodrigues) of the
convict (Roni Kiran Rodrigues) praying that: “be pleased to
release the petitioner’s brother i.e. prisoner – original
accused on Temporary Bail for appearing and self defence as a
party in person on usual terms and conditions…”.

2.0 The
Criminal Appeal No. 898 of 2009 is to come up for Final Hearing on
4th April 2011, but, looking to the other matters on
board, there is no possibility likely to take up the same for Final
Hearing on 4th April 2011. Therefore, this application is
rejected.

3.0 However,
the Registry is directed to place a request of the convict on
record stating therein that, appellant – Roni Kiran Rodrigues
himself is to appear in the appeal, so that, as and when the Court is
likely to take up the matter for Final Hearing, the Court may permit
the appellant to be before the Court.

4.0 With
these observations, the application is rejected.

[
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. ]

[
P. P. Bhatt, J. ]

hiren

   

Top

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information