Roshanlal Kapoor vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income … on 8 April, 2005

0
41
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Chennai
Roshanlal Kapoor vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income … on 8 April, 2005
Equivalent citations: (2007) 108 TTJ Chennai 740
Bench: M Chaturvedi, Vice

ORDER

M.K. Chaturvedi, Vice President

1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A) and relates to the asst. yr. 1996-97.

2. The first issue relates to the levy of interest under Section 234A of the IT Act, 1961. Assessee paid self-assessment tax under Section 140A in December, 1997. Return was filed in August, 1999. Interest under Section 234A was charged until the date of filing the return. It was submitted before me that interest under Section 234A was compensatory and it should be charged only upto the date of payment of tax. To buttress this, reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Dr. Prannoy Roy and Anr. v. CIT this case the Hon’ble High Court has held that interest under Section 234A is payable in a case where tax has not been deposited prior to due date of filing of return, and not where tax has been paid but return has been filed belatedly. No contrary decision was brought before me. I, therefore, direct the AO to recompute the interest accordingly.

3. Next issue relates to the charge of interest under Section 234B of the Act. It was stated that the AO did not make computation correctly. He should be directed to compute the tax in accordance with law. I order accordingly.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed pro tanto.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here