High Court Kerala High Court

Roy Joseph vs State Of Kerala-(Crime … on 11 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
Roy Joseph vs State Of Kerala-(Crime … on 11 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 645 of 2009()


1. ROY JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH, AGED 35 YRS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA-(CRIME NO.296/2004 OF
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :11/02/2009

 O R D E R
                         K. HEMA, J.
        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                      B.A. No. 645 of 2009
        =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
          Dated this the 11thday of February, 2009

                            O R D E R

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offence is under section 8(2) of the Abkari

Act. According to prosecution, petitioner (A1) along with 2nd

accused was found transporting 525 litres of spirit in a car on

28-11-2004 and petitioner was arrested from the spot.

3. Petitioner was released on bail in the crime stage and,

thereafter, he failed to appear during the committal

proceedings. Non bailable warrant was issued and he appeared

and he was released on bail again. Petitioner failed to appear in

court continuously and hence, the case was entered in the

register of long pending cases. Notice was issued to the sureties

and the sureties produced petitioner before the court. Therefore,

the learned Additional Sessions Judge found that petitioner was

deliberately avoiding appearance and the court refused to grant

bail.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that

petitioner did not receive any summons from the court. It is also

submitted that petitioner surrendered by himself before court.

5. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that the case is of the year 2004 and it will be ripe for

BA 645/09 -2-

trial and at this stage, petitioner is released on bail, it is likely

that he may abscond again.

6. On hearing both sides, particularly on going through

the order of the learned Sessions Judge, I find that it is not fit to

grant anticipatory bail at this stage, since it is likely that

petitioner may abscond. Petitioner’s presence could be procured

only when he was produced by the sureties after the court issued

notice to the sureties. Petitioner shall surrender before the trial

court and may move the court concerned, if so advised, for

expeditious disposal of the case.

This petition is dismissed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE.

mn.