High Court Kerala High Court

Roychan.K.M. Kunnumpurathu … vs Suneesh on 12 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Roychan.K.M. Kunnumpurathu … vs Suneesh on 12 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1939 of 2009()


1. ROYCHAN.K.M. KUNNUMPURATHU HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUNEESH,S/O.PRABAKARAN, KULATHINKAL
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHAJAN,PULIKKOTTIYIL HOUSE,

3. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.LEELAMMA GEORGE ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :12/10/2009

 O R D E R
                      M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                 M.A.C.A. NO. 1939 OF 2009
            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 12th day of October, 2009.

                       J U D G M E N T

After going through the award and hearing the learned

counsel for the appellant I feel that the court below has

omitted to frame a very important issue regarding non

joinder of parties. Admittedly the appellant is a registered

owner of the vehicle and the policy stands in his name.

According to him he had transferred the vehicle to one Nazar

by virtue of an agreement, Ext.B2 and it is seen that as per

the police records the vehicle has been taken delivery of by

one Satheesh under the provisions of the M.V.Act. Especially

in the light of S.2(30) of the M.V.Act a person who is in

possession of the property can also be the owner. It has

been held in so many decisions that passing of consideration

and handing over of possession is sufficient to hold the

divestiture of title and therefore ownership can be affixed on

a person even if there is no change in the registration

certificate. These are all matters where one has to analyze

M.A.C.A. 1939 OF 2009
-:2:-

after making necessary parties as parties before Court

especially in this case when the claimant is a pillion rider and

the insurance company has been exonerated from the

liability and so the question looms large on the owner of the

vehicle. Therefore I set aside the award passed by the

Tribunal directing the Tribunal to frame appropriate issue on

non joinder of necessary parties, permit the claimant to take

steps and then decide the matter afresh after affording

sufficient opportunity to all concerned to produce both

documentary as well as oral evidence in support of their

respective contentions. The appellant is directed to appear

before the trial court on 25.11.2009 and take out notice to

other parties for their appearance before the Tribunal.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-