High Court Karnataka High Court

Rudrappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Rudrappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 January, 2009
Author: H.Billappa
WP 190.4990 of 2008

2 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA

CERCUYF BENCH AT EHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 1213 DAY OF JANUARY zoos;

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR.JUsT1c§H.B1LLA:>15;g  

wmr PETITION M4990}! 2003 'g<;s.1ms;%% 4'   * T-- T T

EETWEEN:

1.

,0} ”

Rudrappa, S/o Rachatcppa
Age: 55 Occ: Agril., . 3
Rio: T.C}.Road, Hanagal E
131;: I-IVR. * =

. ShivV§§11afidaf§ya,A 6 étirunath,

Age: “50 ‘years, Agii
R] 0 ‘¥’c;”Dt’EfI§3;vm”i.

.Manikap§{,”

Sfjp Basavantappa Dxmdannanavar,
Age: 6-3 years,

” ~R_;n.~ :3a1in1jx:d,Tq: Hanagal, Dt: HVR

sf 0 Valasangad

Age: é’;i7’years, Occ: Agril,
R/oz: Vifiyanagar

.. Haveii Tqfis Dt: HVR

.’ Préinanathgouda,
; S/0 Virupaxigouda Havanagi

Age 29 years, (Dec: Agril

Rfo Havanagi, Tq: Hanagal, Dt: HVR

(By Sri. Vcemsh R.Budiha1, Adv.)

‘ 7 z ‘ mar, V ” ‘

. . . Petitioners

“{ZI:1en1_i&’i.mE6_{)f.’.VM_034. H ‘
V” ‘ . _ By” its Msa51;~:3gi11g”«l;1iz1ector,

AND:

I. The State of Kamataka, ;
by its Secretary to Government,
Department of Cooperatiazmn, ‘
MS Buiiding,
Bangaioreml.

2. The Commissioner of–Cane Devéipfifiiant

and Director of Sugazg K=–a11>;:taka,’ _

Chougale House,
Cnmccnt Road,

Bangaiomml. __ _ . _ V_

3. ifi ‘
Kharkhsine Niyan1’ita., ‘ ~
Sang11r-581.14&L._: H V
By its ”

. M] 3 Shnec J

No.112, Uthaniar ”

Gandhi. Eldcrado 5″” Floor,

. .S:.1gars Ltd

havimgéis xvegi.*s¥i’:%ra.**d names at

BC 10iSi,_Have1o<ék Road,

Cam , fieglgaum.

‘ ‘ jv ‘ ~ [ Managfing Director.

Iabomtories Pvt Ltd.

2; Pamadi Towers, 2″” Floor

,,_1§z Road,
> 4_ ” __Ba21ga1ore – 9.
By its Managng Dizwector

39/

WP NQ4990 of 2008

WP N0.499{) of 2008

7. The Administrator and the DC
Kamataka Sahakarl Sakkam
Karkhane Niyamita,

Sangur-58 1 148.

Haveri. é Resggondents,

(By smt.vidyavati,, HCGP for R1, Hi”-13;

This petition is filcd undcr._a_1fic1&_s 226″ 227 9f the
Constitution. of India to Aq:1g:zs.Ei’~–Annexu1e~C3 dated
10.01.2008 issued by the. R1,; qusiééiz tI:;::'”:c sQ1utio11 alicged to
have bean passed by the membéts _r::f E3 by virtue of
A1111€X11I’€*-3, and etc. ” A. 1 .V V’

This gi xy hcazm’ g this
day, the Court 31:1ad’€:”th¢ 7 .

.-…._._uu…_.m

E R

A % 2 . _ marsrvzr _
There :3 no mpmaeniauon uni’ the petitioners. Even on

= ._thc er-:;<::asi;c$i1%'–E–,–t£1s11e was no representation. The

interested in prosecuting the matter.

Thcféfdm; petition is disnlisscd for nomprosecution.

Sc!/-3
Judge

j