IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 201 of 2011
Ruplal Mahto .... .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. SINHA
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Mukhopathyay, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, A.P.P.
04/24.03.2011
This revision application shall be heard.
Call for the Lower Court Records of G.R. No. 640 of 2004,
corresponding to T.R. No. 4532 of 2010 from the Court of Shri N. Kumar,
learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih along with the judgment recorded
by the learned Sessions Judge, Giridih in Cr. Appeal No. 53 of 2010 and put up
this case after three weeks.
Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner was convicted under
Sections 279/337 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for six months on each count. Judgment of conviction and order
of sentence recorded against the petitioner was upheld by the learned Sessions
Judge in appeal.
Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner was all along
on bail during trial and appeal and had never misused the privilege of bail and
after his appeal was dismissed, he surrendered in the Court of Shri N. Kumar,
learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih on 24.02.2011 and since then he
is in custody, hence his adinterim bail may be considered.
Taking the considered view, the petitioner, Ruplal Mahto, is
directed to be released, during the pendency of this Cr. Revision, on executing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each
to the satisfaction of Shri N. Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,
Giridih in connection with G.R. No. 640 of 2004, arising out of Nimiaghat P.S.
Case No. 20 of 2004 corresponding to T.R. No. 532 of 2010 with the conditions
that the bailers would be the near relatives of the petitioner and he would co
operate in disposal of this criminal revision, failing to which appropriate order
shall be passed vacating his adinterim bail.
(D.K. Sinha, J.)
Anit