Rushikesh vs Kikiben on 27 January, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/12127/2009	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 12127 of 2009
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9591 of 2009
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================


 

RUSHIKESH
ARVINDBHAI GODIWALA & 2 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

KIKIBEN
WD/O RANCHODBHAI NANABHAI & 9 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MS
RENISHA R VYAS for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 3. 
None for Respondent(s) : 1 - 7,9 - 10. 
RULE
SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2.2.1, 2.2.2,2.2.3  
- for Respondent(s)
: 8, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/01/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

Present
application has been preferred by the applicants original
petitioners permitting the applicants to bring the heirs of original
respondent No.2 on record.

Shri
Jappan Dave, learned advocate for Ms.Kruti M.Shah, learned advocate
appearing on behalf of proposed heirs of original respondent No.2
and has no objection, if the present application is allowed and
respondent Nos. 2/a to 2/c are permitted to be brought on record as
respondent Nos. 2/a to 2/c in the main special civil application as
heirs and legal representatives of original respondent No.2.

In
view of the above, present application is allowed and respondent
Nos. 2/a to 2/c in the present application are permitted to be
brought on record as respondent Nos. 2/a to 2/c in main special
civil application as heirs and legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.2.

Rule
is made absolute accordingly to the aforesaid extent. No costs.

Registry
is directed to amend the cause title of the main special civil
application accordingly.

(M.R.SHAH,
J.)

(ashish)

Top