Karnataka High Court
S.C. Gopalakrishna vs State Of Karnataka Department Of … on 4 March, 2009
1&1
BANGALORE BHRAL
CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTII3
YE ; B
5 1-! c mm
Sf-:3 LATE wqma-rm
AGED ABOUT 39 mans
woaxms AS JGNICR Assrsmm,
BAEJGAIBRE nmmxcr s. B131~It;§1tLDRB. 'aumf; V F.
CENTIU3-L COOPERATIVE BRNK T ~
M Bmm A 'Row " ' V' .
B"I.£3P.E
6 c mama
sic A
AGE}? Amtrr 3': mm _ ; x
womm As Jxmm. mxmi V i
B
CE2~ITR.!9sLCCI=OE'm1=££'1";?'.'§';}'¥sP:I~T1{L'}?Es~~" "
MARBAPPA mm nmrr% C113-'£313
we Lam 1;. V. V' -- '
AC-I-ED ABc:UT<.44«.2Ears'=
wemm as
B _v .
<:£m1wgr._;_ '<':0€aPERH"'£VE BANK LTD
;;::2m':'e\:':m~r1%---%V.B1LA1€:~1, Raw
3.fLm::=:_, _
3 R:
1-sic 51;
% '.j'~..$-::::~iz2JIG=.L«flEE RURAL
4: ' cEmm1;'*%moPzmm'wE amrx my
Mmzzrayea RDA!) my 905:: Dam cmcm
% -3-jL::;2E
' Ff$-' am
-wwn wwwna wr nnmunmmn u-nun wwwma am- mnnuvmamnm smwn muuua ur naxmaauaiwua ntwn uwuxa ur KAKNAEAKA mun mauxr Q? fisAxyunazrmnAL
. =pza5umrmnmaLcm<mmmm:vE
afiéfiKI£$'3fliHB3§RGAD
fififlfiflfiflflflfl Bhflflukflfiklfi
'»_1Tf$aNHuaA
'»_§EE£IHB3E§SENEfiRfi&ET.SEHWKSEQR
mwm wwwma wt" mmmmwmwmaww mssww Mwvmmn Mr' fl'\J'\!!b.l"€P'§.If%il'u"& nman mwwua VI' nnmmmrtnexm ran.-an mwuau UP flflflfifliflfifl nib" Luwm W?" KAKNRERKR HIGH LN
Xfifl
BANGfiLGRE DISTRICT & BANGALGRE
RUREL DISTRICT CENTREL fiD*OP
BANK LTD NELAHANGLA EELHHHNGALR TQ
BANGALGRE RURAL HIST
T sunssa
wonxxne as SENIOR ASST LQEN & MH=_
sU9ERvIsIoN nrvzsxe BANGALORE Bxsmnxcw' "~'
5 BANGALQRE RHRAL nxsrnxcr CENTRAL cc+ap v--II.:II'H
BANK LTD STE HAIR RSAD
CHEHARAJPET
B§NGALGRE"560018
J nayaxana M _W"a_w
wonxzmc AS SENIOR As5r.BanGa$o3£q«V _
arswnxcm a BANGALORE RBRAL_EI£%RIC$f_",
CERTRAL CO~0P BANK LTD IV 7'< ,,*.%
KARRKAPURA BRANCH KENAKa?UBE ".f_
KBNAKAPURA TQ I«°¢;= :1 iv? =I"'
BANGALORE RURAL 31$? ; '~ 'W
caannnasaxaa Radvt, 3
WORKING AS sEkIaa.As$T IA_ I'"
BANGALORE nIsraI¢¥;&fiBANr'nm&E RURAL
nxswnxcm CERTRAL cQȢ?fBgNK,LTn
MELLESHWARAH'a4* " ". ="2
BANGALDRE__ *v' I'
..... .. V
WURKING.;
Como? BANK LTD, HIr_ . "~
DDDABALLAPURA BRANCH;"<q
DODnABALLAPuR, " '__} ;e;*a;x ,
BANGALGRE RURAL DIST, 3*! ,,;LeE$PoNn£NTs
THIS WRIT PETITICN IS FILED fiNDER ARTICLE
226 AND 223 G?""THE"g€QNSTITUTION OF INDIA,
PRAYING TO QUP£flj Tne.*0RnER fiNNEXURE A, me.
18.6.2008 "" "eessen rein THE "R3" IN 30 FAR As
PLACING ;THE. Rasgonnawes .4 TO 2? ABOVE THE
PETTIONERS{<_' V"a KY .'
THIS COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS IITHE 'CQURT PASSED THE FGLLOWING:
ORDER
I~IieaIhed,’;eeunsel for the petitioners
sgbmifs tfiet the relief sought far in the writ
RIeeIitien has been granted by the respondent
‘I;; aufnerity during the pendency’ of the writ
“eetitien. Therefere, he has filed a memo
\W’;<
-9-
seeking permission of this Curt: to withd:_’é’*»;
the writ petition.
2. Memzzv is placed on t__
petition is dismissed
infructuous. No ccasts-“.~._ ‘
_ jhdge
m:.¥/