High Court Kerala High Court

S.Gopinath vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 27 May, 2008

Kerala High Court
S.Gopinath vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 27 May, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(Crl.).No. 50 of 2008(S)


1. S.GOPINATH, AGED 30,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,

3. BEENA, AGED 24 YEARS,

4. BABU, S/O.RAMANKUTTY, MEENU MUNDAYIL,

5. MRS.AMBIKA, W/O.BABU, MEENU MUNDAYIL,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.JOLIMA GEORGE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID

 Dated :27/05/2008

 O R D E R
            KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.
           ----------------------------------------------------------------
                         W.P.(Crl.)NO. 50 OF 2008
           ----------------------------------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 27th day of May, 2008

                                  JUDGMENT

Harun-Ul-Rashid, J.

The petitioner and respondents 3 to 5 are present. The third

respondent is the wife of the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 are her

parents. The parents of the petitioner are also present. At the request of

respondents 4 and 5, we as per order dated 21.2.2008, directed the third

respondent to stay with her parents for a period of three months. The

Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that respondents 4 and 5 have

no right whatsoever to keep the third respondent in their illegal

confinement and for a direction to let the third respondent free.

2. We have talked to the parties at length. The petitioner and the

third respondent submitted before us that they got married on 24.10.2007

at Kanniyamman Koil, Manapakkam, Chengalpet District, Tamil Nadu

according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and that at present both of them

are working in Chennai. We have ascertained from the third respondent

whether she is in illegal confinement of respondents 4 and 5 and she

2

informed us that she is not under any illegal confinement and that she

intends to go and live with her husband, the petitioner herein. In the

circumstances, we direct respondents 4 and 5 to respect and accept the

status of the petitioner and the third respondent as husband and wife.

Respondents 4 and 5 gave graciously agreed to do so.

No further directions are necessary in the Writ Petition. The Writ

Petition is accordingly closed.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

(HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)

sp/

3

KURIAN JOSEPH &
HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ.

L.A.A. NO.

JUDGMENT

27th MAY, 2008